Consultations Are FREE!
Free Consultation Available 24/7
(801) 506-0800
phone

You pay nothing until we win.

Who Is at Fault in a Pedestrian Accident?

Published on August 26, 2026 by Ken Christensen

Key Takeaways:

  • Fault belongs to whoever failed to use reasonable care, so the driver is usually responsible but never automatically.
  • Drivers must yield to people crossing in marked and unmarked crosswalks, including intersections with no paint on the pavement.
  • People on foot carry their own legal duties, and breaking one can shift part of the blame onto them.
  • Reaching 50% of the fault ends the right to recover anything, which is why insurers work to push that number upward.

Fault in a pedestrian accident lies with whoever failed to use reasonable care, which is usually the driver. Utah law stops short of automatic blame, though, and insurance adjusters build their files around that gap. Within days of a collision, an adjuster may already be arguing that you stepped off the curb too quickly or crossed somewhere you should not have.

That argument carries real money behind it: Every percentage point of blame assigned to you reduces what you can recover, and a high enough percentage ends the claim outright. At Good Guys Injury Law, we investigate pedestrian collisions across the state and challenge fault theories while the evidence is still fresh. Call our team and ask for a review of what actually happened to you.

How Fault Works in a Utah Pedestrian Accident

Fault is a legal conclusion, not a judgment about who suffered more. Legal responsibility attaches when four things are true: A duty of reasonable care existed, someone breached that duty, the breach caused the collision, and measurable losses followed.

Both people involved carry duties. A driver owes a heavy obligation to watch for people on foot, and someone crossing the road still has to follow the rules written for pedestrians.

Picture a driver turning right on red who never glances left while a woman crosses with the walk signal. The duty is the yield requirement, the breach is the missed look, the causation is the impact, and the losses are her medical expenses and lost wages. Intent plays no part in that analysis, only the failure to use the care a reasonable driver would have used.

One detail surprises almost everyone: The officer’s opinion in the crash report does not settle fault. Adjusters, and eventually a judge or jury, assign percentages that determine how the money is allocated.

When the Driver Is Legally at Fault

The Utah Traffic Code assigns specific yield duties to drivers. An operator must yield the right-of-way, slowing or stopping as needed, for a person crossing within a crosswalk on the driver’s half of the roadway. That duty also applies when someone approaches closely enough from the opposite half to be in danger.

Drivers must also come to a complete stop at an occupied school crosswalk, and they may not pass a vehicle that has already stopped at a crosswalk. Several driver behaviors show up again and again in the cases we handle:

  • Failing to yield at a crosswalk. Marked or unmarked, an intersection crossing carries the same protection.
  • Turning without a second look. Right turns on red and left turns across traffic produce many crosswalk impacts.
  • Speeding through an intersection. Higher speed shortens reaction time and worsens the severity of every injury.
  • Driving distracted. A phone, a navigation screen, or a conversation pulls a driver’s eyes off the crossing.
  • Driving impaired. Alcohol and drugs slow the response a driver needs when someone steps off the curb.
  • Backing without checking. Parking lots and driveways cause collisions in which the driver never saw the person behind them.

When one of these failures lines up with the moment of impact, the analysis usually points squarely at the driver.

When a Pedestrian Can Share the Blame

The traffic code assigns duties to people on foot as well. Anyone crossing outside a marked crosswalk, or outside an unmarked crosswalk at an intersection, must yield to all vehicles on the roadway. Crossing between two adjacent signalized intersections is limited to marked crosswalks, and diagonal crossing requires a traffic-control device that authorizes it, under Section 41-6a-1003.

One rule catches injured people off guard. A person may not suddenly leave a curb or other place of safety and move into the path of a vehicle close enough to be an immediate hazard. Defense attorneys reach for that provision constantly.

State crash data explains their enthusiasm. The Utah Highway Safety Office reports that the pedestrian was found at fault in 46% of pedestrian crashes. Entering or crossing the road was the most common pedestrian action, while failing to yield and speed led the driver factors.

Several circumstances tend to pull a fault percentage toward the injured person:

  • Crossing mid-block. Stepping into traffic away from an intersection places the duty to yield on the person walking.
  • Emerging from between parked cars. A driver has little chance of reacting when someone suddenly appears.
  • Ignoring a pedestrian signal. Crossing against a stop indication is a violation adjusters seize on.
  • Poor visibility at night. Dark clothing on an unlit street becomes an argument, though it rarely decides a case.
  • Walking in the road with a sidewalk nearby. State law expects people to use a sidewalk when practicable.

None of these facts ends a claim by itself.

The 50% Bar and How Shared Fault Reduces Compensation

The state follows modified comparative fault. You may recover only when the combined fault of the parties you are pursuing exceeds your own share, and no defendant pays more than the proportion of fault assigned to it, under Section 78B-5-818.

The math turns brutal at the midpoint. Suppose documented losses reach $200,000 and a jury assigns you 20% of the blame; recovery drops to $160,000. Move that same figure to 50%, and recovery becomes nothing at all.

That cliff explains behavior injured people find baffling. An adjuster who cannot deny the collision happened can still work to push your share from 30% to 50%, and the attempt costs the insurance company nothing. Recorded statements, apologies offered at the scene, and social media posts all become raw material.

If an adjuster has already hinted that you were partly to blame, call us at (801) 506-0800 before you give a recorded statement.

How No-Fault Benefits Work Before Fault Is Settled

Fault disputes take months. Medical bills do not wait, which is where the no-fault side of Utah’s motor vehicle insurance statutes matters. A person on foot injured in a Utah crash involving an insured vehicle may claim personal injury protection benefits under that vehicle’s policy, regardless of the fault picture.

What Personal Injury Protection Covers

Required benefits start at $3,000 for necessary medical, surgical, hospital, rehabilitation, and related services. Wage loss is covered at the lesser of $250 per week or 85% of gross income, for a maximum of 52 weeks.

Household services are reimbursed up to $20 per day for up to 365 days. Those figures are statutory minimums, and many policies carry more.

When You Can Step Outside the No-Fault System

Personal injury protection does not pay for pain and suffering. To pursue general damages from the driver, an injured person must have sustained death, dismemberment, permanent disability or impairment based on objective findings, permanent disfigurement, a bone fracture, or medical expenses above $3,000.

The bone fracture trigger deserves attention. Many people assume they must clear the dollar threshold, when a single documented fracture opens that door on its own.

Proving Fault After a Pedestrian Crash

Fault percentages are based on evidence, and the evidence that matters most degrades quickly. Skid marks fade, vehicles get repaired, and witnesses forget details.

Evidence That Moves the Fault Percentage

Our team works through a documented sequence in these cases:

  1. Secure the scene record, including photographs, roadway measurements, signal timing, and lighting conditions.
  2. Request nearby video from businesses, doorbell cameras, transit vehicles, and traffic monitoring systems before it overwrites.
  3. Interview witnesses while memories remain specific, then lock statements in writing.
  4. Pull the vehicle’s event data recorder for speed, braking, and steering inputs in the seconds before impact.
  5. Collect the complete medical record that ties each diagnosis to the collision rather than to something earlier.
  6. Retain a reconstruction expert when the driver’s account conflicts with the physical evidence.

That record is what an insurer must answer when it proposes a fault split.

Deadlines That Can End a Valid Claim

Most personal injury actions have a four-year filing deadline, while wrongful death actions must be filed within two years under Title 78B of the Utah Code.

A shorter clock applies when a government entity may be responsible, such as a city that failed to maintain a crosswalk signal. The Governmental Immunity Act requires a notice of claim within one year, and failure to do so bars the claim entirely.

Frequently Asked Questions About Fault in Utah Pedestrian Accidents

Can I still recover if I was crossing outside a crosswalk?

Yes, as long as your share of the fault stays below 50%. Crossing outside a crosswalk increases your percentage, but the driver’s speed, attention, and reaction are still weighed.

Does the police report decide who was at fault?

No. The report is evidence that adjusters and juries consider, but it does not control the outcome, and we have seen fault findings change once video or event data surfaces.

Who pays my medical bills while fault is still disputed?

Personal injury protection benefits from the involved vehicle’s policy pay first, regardless of fault. Health insurance may cover treatment beyond those limits, subject to reimbursement later.

What if the driver claims I stepped off the curb suddenly?

That is a common defense, and it points to a specific statutory duty. We look for video, witness accounts, and vehicle data that establish where you were and how long you were visible.

Can a city share fault for a pedestrian crash?

Sometimes, if a signal malfunctioned, sight lines were obstructed, or a crosswalk was poorly maintained. These claims carry a one-year notice deadline, so they need attention early.

Does an unmarked crosswalk still protect me?

Yes. An unmarked crosswalk at an intersection carries the same driver yield duty as a painted one, which surprises many drivers and their insurers.

Find Out Who Is at Fault in Your Utah Pedestrian Accident

Being struck while walking leaves you with injuries, questions, and an adjuster already assembling a version of events that costs you money. Good Guys Injury Law handles pedestrian collision claims on a contingency fee basis, so a fault review costs you nothing up front.

Our attorneys request the video, data, and witness accounts that fix your position on the road before that evidence disappears. We handle the insurance communication while you focus on treatment, and we honestly explain what the evidence of fault supports.

Attorneys Ken Christensen and Russ Hymas offer a free case evaluation to anyone injured in a pedestrian accident. Call (801) 506-0800 or reach us through our contact page to find out who is at fault in your case.

 

 

Good Guys Injury Law - Orem

1145 S 800 E #101A Orem,UT 84097

Phone: (801) 224-2999

Good Guys Injury Law - Bountiful

503 W 2600 S #200 Bountiful,UT 84010

Phone: (801) 294-9500

Good Guys Injury Law - Salt Lake City

32 W 200 S Salt Lake City, UT 84101

Phone: (801) 849-1949

Good Guys Injury Law - Draper

11693 S 700 E #100

Draper, UT 84020

Phone: (801) 506-0800

How useful was this post?

Click on a star to rate it!

Average rating 0 / 5. Vote count: 0

No votes so far! Be the first to rate this post.

Kenneth L. Christensen
Founding Attorney

Ken Christensen, founder of Christensen & Hymas, is a Utah personal injury attorney dedicated to defending injury victims and securing fair settlements. Authorized to practice in all Utah courts, he takes pride in advocating for injured Utahns while balancing work, family, and his love for fishing.